Freedom of Speech and Case Mikko Ellilä
by Aapo Puhakka
Back to political opinions
Another article, which is under prosecution: Muutama täky Illmanin Mikalle by Jussi Halla-aho
Happened so far
In December 2006 Mikko Ellilä
published an article
Society Consists of People,
where is some controversial claims.
In February 2007, Ombudsman for Minorities of Finland, Mikko Puumalainen, made
an request for preliminary investigation of ethnic agitation
to the Finnish National Bureau of Investigation.
Some time before that (perhaps in 2004 or 2005), Mikko Puumalainen had made somewhat similar
investigation request against Tatu Vanhanan and his book IQ and the Wealth of Nations.
The results were negative. This case seems to be somewhat similar.
In April 2007, Mikko Puumalainen made several public comments, that the Internet should be
censored of material critical for multi-culturalism.
In the beginning of May 2007, Mikko Ellilä heard about the investigation and caused a huge
national and international uproar of the matter in the blogosphere.
Personally, I do not agree with everything Mikko Ellillä writes.
My comments and thoughts about the most controversial aspect of the article
follow later in this page.
However I respect the freedom of speech and I dislike censoring of the Internet.
I think Ellilä has the right to write whatever he writes. There are no clear
lies, altough controversial claims (which are likely to be incorrect in my opinion)
sure are. And there is no agitation for violence.
Because the matter has rised a huge international uproar and the original article
is in Finnish, it would be unfair, if the non-Finnish-speaking people couldn't read it.
So I publish here my English
translation of the article.
In case, that the original Finnish article disappears,
here is a backup-copy of it.
My comments and thoughts of the most controversial aspect of the subject matter
It is a sad thing and a fact, that most countries and communities, where majority of people
are of African or Muslim origin, are in a miserable state economically. Whether this is
a cause of biological/genetic factor or the real culprit is traditional African tribal
and Islamic culture, is a controversial question, to which there is no definitive answer yet.
Personally, I'm inclined to believe, that the traditional African and Islamic culture
is the major factor. Genetic things might have some minimal part. Colonialism might have
something to do with it, but it really is very minimal, because those countries and communities
haven't raised from their sad state (unlike several East-Asian countries), altough colonialism
ended a long time ago.
Some research could be done, to explore the matter more thoroughly.
Some research could be done easily with a little bit of Wikipedia-search and data-analysis,
more thorough exploration would require interviews.
Easy Research
Idea for an easy research:
Let's put in a database some data of each country of the Earth,
which is easily available from Wikipedia.
The fields of a database table COUNTRY could be:
- GDP
- Population
- Continent
- Dominant Major Race (for example White, Black, Arabic, Middle-Asian, Indian or East-Asian)
- Dominant Minor Race (for example West Europe, Mediterranean Europe, East Europe, Black, Arabic, Middle-Asian, Indian, Chinese, Korean, Japanese, South-East-Asian)
- Dominant Major Religion (for example Christianism/Judaism, Islam, Hinduism, Buddhism/Confutseanism/Sinto)
- Dominant Minor Religion (for example Catholism, Protestantism, Orthodox, Judaism, Sunni Muslim, Shia Muslim, Hinduism, Buddhism, Confuntseanism, Sinto-Buddhism)
- Dominant Cultural Background (European, African, Middle-Eastern, Native American, Indian, Chinese)
- Current Economic System (Capitalism, Socialism, Mercantilism, Feodalism/Medieval, Tribal)
- Most Characteristic Economic System within the last 50 years (Capitalism, Socialism, Mercantilism, Feodalism/Medieval, Tribal)
- Current Political System (Republic, Sosialist Dictatorship, Military Dictatorship, Theocratic Dictatorship, Tribal)
- Most Characteristic Political System within the last 50 years (Republic, Sosialist Dictatorship, Military Dictatorship, Theocratic Dictatorship, Tribal)
- Levels of Literacy now and within the last 50 years (some classification)
- Levels of Education now and within the last 50 years (some classification)
- Status of Women now and within the last 50 years (some classification)
- Status of Children now and within the last 50 years (some classification)
- Levels of Corruption now and within the last 50 years (some classification)
- Respect of Laws now and within 50 years (some classification)
- Crime Rate now and within 50 years (some classification)
- Peacefullness (Peace, War, Civil War, etc.) now and within 50 years
- Consumption of Alcohol and Drugs now and within 50 years
- Natural Disasters now and within 50 years
- Climate (North-European, Central-European, Mediterranean, Desert, Jungle)
- Mean Temperature
- Difference of Yearly Temperature Extremes
- Amount of Rain
- Level of Technology
- Proportions of Agriculture / Manufacturing / Services
- Level of Transportation Infrastructure (roads, railroads, etc.)
- Level of Telecommunication Infrastructure
- Level of Software Automation
- Size of Public Sector
- Amount of Military Spending
- Amount of Work-based Immigration
- Amount of Refugees
- Health of People
- and so on ..
And some more possibilities there sure are as well.
I think information should be put in for each field for each country,
even if it would be only an educated guess. If it's an educated guess,
some classification of the validness of the information
and some textual description of the guess might be good.
With this data, it would be easy for everybody interested to do different analysis,
of which factor is relevant, almost only with some SQL-queries and simple calculation.
Thorough Research
More thorough research-idea would be to make interviews of backgrounds, abilities and beliefs of people.
Beliefs to look for and data to be gathered could be for example:
- Education, Religion, Ethnic Background, Nationality, Sex, Age, Occupation, Income, Wealth, Marital Status, Amount of Children, No/Stability/Length of Mariages/Relationships, Amount and Quality of Friends, Amount and Quality of Family, etc.
- Opinions of Women, Men, Children, Poor, Rich, Other People, Cultures, Religions, etc.
- Knowledge of Mathematics, Technology, Computers, Literacy, Economics, History, Arts, Music, Languages, etc.
- Amount of Sleep, Sex, Food, Alcohol, Drugs, etc.
- Health, Physical and Mental
- Status of Love Life
- Status of Sex Life
- Ability for Self Observation
- Major Emotional State
- Quality and Type of Personal Boundaries
- Prejudices, Naivety, Criminal Tendencies, etc.
- Looking for win/win, win/loose, loose/win or loose/loose deals ?
- General Outlook for Life
- Clear Definite Major Purpose for Life (Desire)
- Realisticality of Desire
- Amount of Faith to Desire
- Use of Visualisation
- Use of Autosuggestion
- Amount of Personal Experience
- Use of Imagination
- Amount of Organised Planning to Attain Goals
- Ability to Make Decisions
- Amount of Persistence
- Amount and Quality of Sexual Expression and Capability for Transformation of Sexual Desire
- Social Communication Ability
- Capability to Handle Money and Make Investment Decisions
- Amount of Fear of Poverty
- Amount of Fear of Criticism
- Amount of Fear of Ill Health
- Amount of Fear of Loss of Love of Someone
- Amount of Fear of Old Age
- Amount of Fear of Death
- Capability to Adopt Positive Influences from Other People
- Capability to Avoid Negative Influences from Other People
- and so on ..
As a conclusion I might state, that because the article inspired so much
creative ideas for example research possibilities,
censoring it would have been a very stupid move.
Aapo Puhakka